Possible link between electronic billboards and highway crashes
A study published in Traffic Injury Prevention has found that drivers take more and longer glances at electronic billboards than regular signs, indicating a possible link between these digital signs and highway crashes.
Eye-grabbing, electronic signs replacing traditional billboards along highways are meant to attract and keep the attention of passersby with bright colours and constantly changing messages. The ramifications for traffic safety have been long debated, and this study provides scientific evidence previously lacking.
The study used sophisticated eye-tracking devices to monitor the visual behaviours of experienced drivers passing traditional and electronic billboards during day and night conditions. The experimental route was a 40 km long stretch of a three-lane motorway with heavy traffic running through central Stockholm, Sweden.
The electronic billboards attracted significantly more visual attention than the other traffic signs included in the study. Dwell times were longer, the visual time-sharing intensity was higher, very long single glances were more frequent and the number of fixations were greater for the electronic billboards. Although whether the electronic billboards constitute a traffic safety hazard cannot be answered conclusively based on the present data, these findings do validate existing concerns about the relationship between electronic billboards and higher crash risks.
The full article is available at http://www.tandfonline.com/doi/full/10.1080/15389588.2012.731546.
What are the psychological costs when both partners work from home?
Australian and international researchers have considered the psychological and relational costs...
Do early-life natural disaster experiences shape safer workplaces?
Data mapping the records of over 500 CEOs, Canadian researchers have considered whether childhood...
LGBTIQ+ workers are 1.5x more likely to experience discrimination and/or harassment
Australian data released today reveals that LGBTIQ+ people are 1.5 times more likely than...
